Sukuh and Cetho Temples: A Comparative Study of History, Architect, and Culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36706/jc.v12i1.128Keywords:
Sukuh Temple, Cetho Temple, History Aspects, Architecture, CulturalAbstract
Sukuh Temple and Cetho Temple are relics of high value and inherit the values of life for the surrounding community. Archaeologically these two temples have differences. On that basis, the problem in this study is how to compare the history of Sukuh Temple and Cetho Temple as well as from architectural and cultural aspects. This article then aims to explain the similarities and differences in the historical, architectural and cultural aspects of Sukuh and Cetho Temples. The research method used is qualitative with an exploratory study that is descriptive naturalistic in nature. The results showed that the Sukuh and Cetho Temples were built during the Majapahit Kingdom. In the architectural aspect, Sukuh and Cetho Temples have similarities and differences related to the shape, location and
arrangement of the reliefs. In terms of cultural aspects, the people around Sukuh and Cetho Temples have local traditions and culture, namely Grebek Sukuh, Ruwatan Tradition, Galungan Ceremony, Dawuhan, Pancawali Krama and Medang Siang. This tradition contains religious values, mutual cooperation, togetherness and tolerance values.
Downloads
References
Coedes, G. (2017). Asia Tenggara Masa Hindhu-Buddha. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Darini, R. (2013). Sejarah Kebudayaan Indonesia Masa Hindu Budha. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
Djafar, H. (2009). Masa akhir Majapahit: Girindrawardhana dan masalahnya. Komunitas Bambu.
Finantoko, D., & Nurcahyo, A. (2015). Pengaruh Candi Cetho sebagai Objek Wisata Sejarah Terhadap Kehidupan Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Desa Gumeng, Kecamatan Jenawi, Kabupaten Karanganyar. Jurnal Agastya, 5(2), 99-122. https://doi.org/10.25273/ajsp.v5i02.888 .
Herimanto. (2018). Sejarah dan Arsitektur Candi di Indonesia. Sukoharjo: Diomedia.
Ibrahim, E., & Putranto, S. B. 2016. Champa Kerajaan Kuno di Vietnam. Jakarta: Batara Ahara Nusa.
Irawan, S. E., & Pamungkas, Y. H. (2017). Candrasengkala Memet Pada Candi Sukuh dan Candi Cetho Sebagai Representasi Kebudayaan Masa Akhir Majapahit. Avatara, e-Journal Pendidikan Sejarah, 5(1), 1334-1339. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/avatara/article/view/17443.
Prahono, K. R. (2011). Candi Cetho. Karanganyar.
Prasetyo, D.A. “Cerminan Etika Dalam Hubungan Antar-Manusia Analisis Pada Beberapa
Ornamen Candi Sukuh”, hlm:6, http://journal.unair.ac.id/filerPDF/CERMINAN%20ETIKA.pdf
Purwanto, H. (2017). Candi Sukuh Sebagai Tempat Kegiatan Kaum Rsi. Jurnal Berkala Arkeologi, 37(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v37i1.127.
Purwanto, H., & Titasari, C. P. (2018). Arca di Candi Cetho: Interpretasi Baru Sebagai Arca Panji. Forum Arkeologi, 31(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.24832/fa.v31i1.513
Purwanto, H. (2020). “Beberapa Karanganyar”.Candra Keistimewaan Sangkala,Vol.2,No.1,25 Candi Cetho September Di Kabupaten 2020,hlm:
, https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JCS/article/view/28806
Prasetyo, D. A. (2006). Cerminan Etika dalam Hubungan Antar-Manusia Analisis pada Beberapa Ornamen Candi Sukuh. Jurnal Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik (Universitas Airlangga), 19(3), 59-67.
Qosim, M. Z. (2019). Di Balik Runtuhnya Majapahit Dan Berdirinya Kerajaan-Kerajaan Islam di Jawa. Yogyakarta: Araska.
Rahardjo, S. (2011). Peradaban Jawa Dari Mataram Kuno Sampai Majapahit Akhir. Jakarta: Komunitas Bambu.
Raffles, T. S. (2014). The History of Java. Yogyakarta: Narasi.
Rahmawati, Aneke dan Azmy Hanif. 2021.” Analisis Nilai Sejarah dan Kesakralan Candi Cetho Sebagai Ajang Promosi Daya Tarik Wisata Kabupaten Karanganyar”. Jurnal Pariwisata Indonesia, Vol.17,No.2,Tahun 2021,hlm:27-28. https://jurnal.stpsahidsurakarta.ac.id/index.php/JPI/article/view/247
Scheltema, J. F. (2018). Monumental Jawa: Sejarah Candi dan Monumen di Jawa. Yogyakarta: Alexander Books.
Sujarweni, W. (2012). Jelajah Candi Kuno Nusantara. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.
Stutterheim, W. F. (1956). An Ancient Javanese Bhima Cult. In Studies in Indonesian archaeology (pp. 105-143). Springer, Dordrecht.
Syafi’i, Achmad.2021. “Makna Simbol Relief Sengkalan Candi Sukuh”.Acintya: Jurnal Penelitian Seni Budaya, Volume 13,No.2, Desember 2021, hlm: 184. https://jurnal.isiska.ac.id/index.php/acintya/article/view/4050/3111
Wirakusumah, I.A.(2017). “Langgam Arsitektur Candi Sukuh”. Media Matrasain. 14(1), 55, https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jmm/article/view/15445/14989
Wuryani, Emy dan Wahyu Purwiyastuti.2012.” Potensi Sosial Budaya Masyarakat Dusun Cetho Sebagai Embrio Ekowisata Rakyat Di Kabupaten Karanganyar”.Jurnal Satya Widya,Vol.8, No.1,Juni 2012,hlm: 18. https://ejournal.uksw.edu/satyawidya/article/download/137/125/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Isawati, Musa Pelu, Nur Fatah Abidin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
